From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262352AbTLIXfa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:35:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263205AbTLIXfa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:35:30 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:35296 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262352AbTLIXfZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:35:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:35:23 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test11-wli-1 Message-ID: <20031209233523.GS8039@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031204200120.GL19856@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031204200120.GL19856@holomorphy.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:01:20PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Successfully tested on a Thinkpad T21. Any feedback regarding > performance would be very helpful. Desktop users should notice top(1) > is faster, kernel hackers that kernel compiles are faster, and highmem > users should see much less per-process lowmem overhead. Bill Davidsen reported an issue where compiled kernel images aren't properly distinguished from mainline kernels' by installation scripts. The following patch should resolve this: -- wli diff -prauN wli-2.6.0-test11-37/Makefile wli-2.6.0-test11-38/Makefile --- wli-2.6.0-test11-37/Makefile 2003-11-26 12:44:43.000000000 -0800 +++ wli-2.6.0-test11-38/Makefile 2003-12-09 15:32:53.000000000 -0800 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 6 SUBLEVEL = 0 -EXTRAVERSION = -test11 +EXTRAVERSION = -test11-wli-1 # *DOCUMENTATION* # To see a list of typical targets execute "make help"