From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263983AbTLJVyf (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:54:35 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264112AbTLJVyf
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:54:35 -0500
Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28]:32441 "EHLO
	mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263983AbTLJVyd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:54:33 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:54:11 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Message-ID: <20031210215411.GC15401@matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:39:07AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.

Is it stable?