From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261875AbTLKCKi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:10:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262319AbTLKCKi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:10:38 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:7396 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261875AbTLKCKh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:10:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:10:31 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: bill davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test11-wli-1 Message-ID: <20031211021031.GW8039@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , bill davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031209233523.GS8039@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >|> Bill Davidsen reported an issue where compiled kernel images aren't >|> properly distinguished from mainline kernels' by installation scripts. >|> The following patch should resolve this: Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: >| Argh, i've been screaming about this for ages... On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:42:00AM +0000, bill davidsen wrote: > Look, I'm a big boy now, I should be smart enough to *check* this, > because every once in a while other people (you know who you are) do it > too. My fault, I just noted it because other people may not be backed up > as well as I am and shoot their only working kernel. You don't have to run into it to report it. =) At any rate, I hope it does prevent confusion elsewhere. -- wli