From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265218AbTLKTiC (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:38:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265219AbTLKTiC
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:38:02 -0500
Received: from nsmtp.pacific.net.th ([203.121.130.116]:57482 "EHLO
	nsmtp.pacific.net.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S265218AbTLKTiA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:38:00 -0500
From: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:36:38 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> <20031210215411.GC15401@matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031210215411.GC15401@matchmail.com>
X-OS: KDE 3 on GNU/Linux
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200312120336.38918.mhf@linuxmail.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:54, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:39:07AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
> 
> Is it stable?
> 
> 

Yes