From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264537AbTLLLIX (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:08:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264538AbTLLLIX (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:08:23 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:5321 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264537AbTLLLIW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:08:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:08:10 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Vid Strpic , Mike Fedyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Backport ide-cd cdrecord support to 2.4 Message-ID: <20031212110810.GR7599@suse.de> References: <20031212101748.GE11146@home.bofhlet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031212101748.GE11146@home.bofhlet.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 12 2003, Vid Strpic wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 03:08:30PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > If there's one feature that I'd love to see in 2.4 it's eliminating my need > > for ide-scsi completely. :) > > Erm? If fresh enough cdrtools, burning over atapi works in 2.4 too... > I didn't say it's good, no, but it certainly works. It's a bad solution though, even ide-scsi is faster than that :) -- Jens Axboe