From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261311AbTLLQvP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:51:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261326AbTLLQvO (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:51:14 -0500 Received: from fed1mtao03.cox.net ([68.6.19.242]:63457 "EHLO fed1mtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261311AbTLLQvL (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:51:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:51:10 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: bill davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] -tiny tree for small systems (2.6.0-test11) Message-ID: <20031212165110.GR23731@stop.crashing.org> References: <20031212033734.GG23787@waste.org> <20031212154443.GN23731@stop.crashing.org> <20031212155948.GK23787@waste.org> <20031212160508.GO23731@stop.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:17:30PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote: > In article <20031212160508.GO23731@stop.crashing.org>, > Tom Rini wrote: > > | Well part of the problem that came up when this was brought up during > | 2.5 is that adding a whole bunch of CONFIG options for things Just Won't > | Happen (too complex, PITA, etc). OTOH however, lots of stuff like that > | keeps getting in. > > But now we have a config section for disabling things which may not be > needed in embedded systems. So there's a fair chance that tweaks and > such can be accepted as long as they're in the area where most will > never go. That was the case at the time as well. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/