From: Daniel Tram Lux <daniel@starbattle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ide.c as a module
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031212171711.GA15954@starbattle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312121646.04047.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Hi Bartlomiej,
I applied your changes only, reverting all of mine...
moving the initializing=1 also solves the multiple init problem...thanks
here is how the patch looks like now:
--- ./linux-2.4.23.org/drivers/ide/ide.c 2003-11-28 19:26:20.000000000 +0100
+++ ./linux-2.4.23/drivers/ide/ide.c 2004-03-12 17:56:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@
*/
ide_module_t *ide_chipsets;
ide_module_t *ide_modules;
-ide_module_t *ide_probe;
/*
* This is declared extern in ide.h, for access by other IDE modules:
@@ -307,6 +306,7 @@
init_hwif_data(index);
/* Add default hw interfaces */
+ initializing = 1;
ide_init_default_hwifs();
idebus_parameter = 0;
@@ -512,20 +512,6 @@
}
}
-void ide_probe_module (int revaldiate)
-{
- if (!ide_probe) {
-#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_MODULE)
- (void) request_module("ide-probe-mod");
-#endif
- } else {
- (void) ide_probe->init();
- }
- revalidate_drives(revaldiate);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_probe_module);
-
void ide_driver_module (int revaldiate)
{
int index;
@@ -534,7 +520,8 @@
for (index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; ++index)
if (ide_hwifs[index].present)
goto search;
- ide_probe_module(revaldiate);
+ ideprobe_init();
+ revalidate_drives(revaldiate);
search:
while (module) {
(void) module->init();
@@ -1141,6 +1128,7 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_setup_ports);
+extern int ideprobe_init_module (void);
/*
* Register an IDE interface, specifing exactly the registers etc
@@ -1181,7 +1169,10 @@
hwif->chipset = hw->chipset;
if (!initializing) {
- ide_probe_module(1);
+#ifdef MODULE
+ if (ideprobe_init_module() == -EBUSY)
+#endif
+ ideprobe_init();
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
create_proc_ide_interfaces();
#endif
@@ -2954,7 +2945,6 @@
*/
devfs_handle_t ide_devfs_handle;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_probe);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ide_devfs_handle);
static int ide_notify_reboot (struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *x)
@@ -3024,7 +3014,6 @@
ide_init_builtin_subdrivers();
#endif /* CLASSIC_BUILTINS_METHOD */
- initializing = 1;
ide_init_builtin_drivers();
initializing = 0;
--- ./linux-2.4.23.org/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c 2003-11-28 19:26:20.000000000 +0100
+++ ./linux-2.4.23/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c 2004-03-12 17:56:37.000000000 +0100
@@ -1407,8 +1407,6 @@
probe_hwif_init(&ide_hwifs[index]);
#endif /* HWIF_PROBE_CLASSIC_METHOD */
- if (!ide_probe)
- ide_probe = &ideprobe_module;
MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
return 0;
}
@@ -1436,7 +1434,6 @@
void ideprobe_cleanup_module (void)
{
- ide_probe = NULL;
ide_xlate_1024_hook = 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ideprobe_init_module);
Regards
Daniel
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:46:04PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 12 of December 2003 15:42, Daniel Tram Lux wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried with using only your suggested changes and removing the ide_probe
> ^^^^
> Your patch + changes or only changes?
>
> > ptr, but due to (in include/asm-i386/ide.h) where CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI is
> > indeed undefined:
> >
> > static __inline__ void ide_init_default_hwifs(void)
> > {
> > #ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI
> > hw_regs_t hw;
> > int index;
> >
> > for(index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; index++) {
> > memset(&hw, 0, sizeof hw);
> > ide_init_hwif_ports(&hw, ide_default_io_base(index), 0, NULL);
> > hw.irq = ide_default_irq(ide_default_io_base(index));
> > ide_register_hw(&hw, NULL);
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI */
> > }
> >
> > I get the following probing messages (I enabled a debug message which is
> > why there are so many messages):
>
> "initializing = 1" must be moved from ide_init() to ide_init_data()
> (just before ide_init_default_hwifs() call).
>
> --bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-12 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-11 20:25 [patch] ide.c as a module Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-11 21:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-11 21:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-12 9:20 ` Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-12 13:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-12 14:42 ` Daniel Tram Lux
2003-12-12 15:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-12 17:17 ` Daniel Tram Lux [this message]
2003-12-12 17:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-18 0:29 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-12-19 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-19 17:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-19 20:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-20 2:59 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031212171711.GA15954@starbattle.com \
--to=daniel@starbattle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox