From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261744AbTLLRzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:55:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261753AbTLLRzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:55:49 -0500 Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28]:13215 "EHLO mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261744AbTLLRzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:55:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:55:42 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Backport ide-cd cdrecord support to 2.4 Message-ID: <20031212175542.GK15401@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031211230830.GJ15401@matchmail.com> <20031212074414.GO7599@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031212074414.GO7599@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:44:14AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > If there's one feature that I'd love to see in 2.4 it's eliminating my need > > for ide-scsi completely. :) > > Well that's not going to happen. It's not an isolated feature, it's a > small addon to the new block io infrastructure in 2.6. Drat, I didn't realize it depended on the BIO infrastructure. Thanks for clairifying.