From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262709AbTLLWob (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:44:31 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262714AbTLLWob
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:44:31 -0500
Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:32899 "EHLO
	mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262709AbTLLWoa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:44:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:43:58 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
       gene.heskett@verizon.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] FUSYN 5/10: kernel fuqueues
Message-ID: <20031212224358.GB15935@mail.shareable.org>
References: <A20D5638D741DD4DBAAB80A95012C0AE0125E23B@orsmsx409.jf.intel.com> <20031212032301.GF23787@waste.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031212032301.GF23787@waste.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Matt Mackall wrote:
> The obvious pronunciation is closer to "fuck you" (fuh-queue or
> fuq-ueue), which is a little more pointed.

Like the obvious pronunciation of "futex" as "fuh-teks"?  Not!

I say keep the fuqueues as the foo-queues they so beautifully are.

-- Jamie