From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265367AbTLNJC7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 04:02:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265368AbTLNJC7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 04:02:59 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:36033 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265367AbTLNJC6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 04:02:58 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:58:43 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: prepare_to_wait/waitqueue_active issues in 2.6 Message-ID: <20031214085842.GP17683@krispykreme> References: <20031214034059.GL17683@krispykreme> <20031214035356.GM17683@krispykreme> <20031214052330.GN17683@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'll go back to my lazy ways in 2.7.x, I'm sure. Phew, you had me worried for a while :) > Anyway, even if I think the patch is "obviously correct", can you do me a > favor and test it on the load that you've seen failing? Just to be anal. Sure, we'll run with this patch and report back. Anton