public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
Cc: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:03:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031214110347.GD318@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1071376690.2187.25.camel@laptop-linux>

HI!

> That's a bit rough, isn't it Pavel? I fully agree that the power
> management support in 2.4 is incomplete (just as is the case in 2.6),
> but there is power management support in 2.4, and it is being used.

Okay, I was a bit rough. Anyway pm support in 2.4 can not be made
complete by simply fixing all the drivers (unlike 2.6). I know that it
can be made to work pretty well for a lot of user, but I still do not
think that makes it suitable for 2.4 merge.
								Pavel

> Regards,
> 
> Nigel
> 
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
> > 
> > 2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and
> > working, but it is still a hack.
> > 							Pavel

-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]

      reply	other threads:[~2003-12-14 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-10 21:39 RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-11 19:36   ` Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:55 ` Matt H.
2003-12-12 19:22 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-14  4:38   ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-12-14 11:03     ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031214110347.GD318@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox