From: Ross Dickson <ross@datscreative.com.au>
To: lkml-2315@mc.frodoid.org
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
forming@charter.net, Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IRQ disabled (SATA) on NForce2 and my theory
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:13:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312151113.52165.ross@datscreative.com.au> (raw)
<snip>
>It was most noticeable for the timer interrupt, because the timer
> interrupt is basically always at "high load" and a lack of it would
> result in a hard lockup of the board. However, it now seems like the
> timer interrupt isn't the only interrupt suffering from this issue.
>So, I think inserting the small delay in the appropriate IRQ
> handler might fix this, too.
>But there's still the question, why the delay is actually needed for
> NForce2 boards. That would basically mean that you'll have to
> introduce the delay for *every* IRQ, to avoid a lockup of any device
> that will do high load at some time. I bet that, if I put my Firewire
> Card back in (or just use the onboard Firewire ports) and stream a
> video from my DV cam onto the harddisk, it would lock up as well after
> a very short time, since those who know DV also know that DV has a
> very high bandwidth, half an hour of film is like 40GB or the
> like. (However, I can't test this right now, because my DV cam is
> currently not accessible)
>So, we're still not "rock solid" with NForce2, I guess...
> Any idea?
>Regards,
> Julien
> -
If it is a C1 disconnect reconnection as we suspect then it should affect all
local apic interrupts so the following is the conservative approach which may help.
here is one of many educated? guesswork posts on topic
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2003-12/2307.html
If you want to put the delay in all local apic irq acks then remove the delay code
from apic.c and put it in
/usr/src/linux-2.4.23-rd2/include/asm-i386/apic.h
also needs to bring in delay.h
I am trying it now for my patched 2.4.23 (it boots and runs OK so far) kern as
follows but if it is really needed there then it would be better merged within
the macro style of the bad ioapic selection code and given a kernel config
selection mechanism.
#ifndef __ASM_APIC_H
#define __ASM_APIC_H
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <asm/apicdef.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
<snip>
static inline void ack_APIC_irq(void)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_MK7) && defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX)
/*
* on 2200XP & nforce2 chipset we need at least 500ns delay here
* to stop lockups with udma100 drive. try to scale delay time
* with cpu speed. Ross Dickson.
*/
ndelay((cpu_khz >> 12)+200 ); /* don't ack too soon or hard lockup */
#endif
/*
* ack_APIC_irq() actually gets compiled as a single instruction:
* - a single rmw on Pentium/82489DX
* - a single write on P6+ cores (CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC)
* ... yummie.
*/
/* Docs say use 0 for future compatibility */
apic_write_around(APIC_EOI, 0);
}
<snip>
Also note I stuffed up the syntax of the original #ifdef, code still works but
only tests the first param not both. The ifdef code should also be adjusted for
the ioapic patch if it is to be used widely on other chipsets and processor types.
Also others more familiar with the kernel build system could choose better
config params to test against.
Anyhow we are still flying blind so far as manufacturers comments on this
topic.
So maybe occasional lockups could be caused by this on other AMD cpu systems?
I don't know.
Don't forget to recompile & install modules given the inline code above.
Please cc me as to how it goes if you try it.
Regards
Ross
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-15 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-15 1:13 Ross Dickson [this message]
2003-12-15 6:22 ` IRQ disabled (SATA) on NForce2 and my theory Bob
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-14 13:14 Julien Oster
2003-12-15 6:06 ` Bob
2003-12-15 14:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-12-16 3:56 ` Bob
2003-12-16 20:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200312151113.52165.ross@datscreative.com.au \
--to=ross@datscreative.com.au \
--cc=forming@charter.net \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml-2315@mc.frodoid.org \
--cc=pomac@vapor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox