From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263740AbTLOPoz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:44:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263760AbTLOPoz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:44:55 -0500 Received: from pf138.torun.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.207.138]:2052 "EHLO centaur.culm.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263740AbTLOPox convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:44:53 -0500 From: Witold Krecicki To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: raid0 slower than devices it is assembled of? Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:44:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <200312151434.54886.adasi@kernel.pl> In-Reply-To: <200312151434.54886.adasi@kernel.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200312151644.46130.adasi@kernel.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dnia Monday 15 of December 2003 14:34, Witold Krecicki napisa³: also, what I got while investigating why one drive is slower than another - is there a way to use SMART on a drive connected via SATA-libata? -- Witold Krêcicki (adasi) adasi [at] culm.net GPG key: 7AE20871 http://www.culm.net