From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com
Subject: Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:24:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031215192402.528ce066.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031215132720.GX7308@phunnypharm.org
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:27:20 -0500 Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:11:26PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > I see another missing feature - there does not seem to be a way to
> > order the changesets by the order of merging them into the tree. E.g.
> > when you look at the linux-2.4 changesets, you will now find XFS all
> > over the place - even before 2.4.23, while it really has been merged
> > after 2.4.23.
>
> You don't seem to understand how bitkeeper works then. Back when the XFS
> tree was cloned from the 2.4 tree, it began it's own "branch". Over time
> it has merged code from the 2.4 tree, and it's work has occured over
> this same time.
>
> When XFS was merged back into the 2.4 tree, it retains all of that
> history in sort of a split road looking branch/merge.
Keeping that history is good. But the main 2.4 branch also has its own
history - and it shows that there were no XFS code in that branch up
to and including 2.4.23.
There does not seem to be a way to get this information - at least
through bkbits.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-15 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-14 17:21 RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper Larry McVoy
2003-12-14 23:05 ` Keith Owens
2003-12-14 23:44 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 0:25 ` Keith Owens
2003-12-15 3:47 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-14 23:17 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-14 23:43 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 0:19 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-15 3:46 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 6:07 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-15 16:02 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 19:52 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-15 6:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-15 12:11 ` Sergey Vlasov
2003-12-15 13:27 ` Ben Collins
2003-12-15 16:24 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2003-12-15 16:32 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 18:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15 18:58 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 19:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15 21:44 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15 22:14 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 22:44 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-15 23:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15 22:36 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-15 22:46 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 23:08 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-12-17 4:47 ` Matthew D. Pitts
2003-12-15 15:42 ` Larry McVoy
2003-12-15 15:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-15 23:18 ` Chris Frey
2003-12-21 20:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-21 20:46 ` John Bradford
2003-12-24 1:49 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031215192402.528ce066.vsu@altlinux.ru \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=bitkeeper-users@bitmover.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox