From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Toad <toad@amphibian.dyndns.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 'bad: scheduling while atomic!', preempt kernel, 2.6.1-test11, reading an apparently duff DVD-R
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031215200456.GB12192@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312151149550.1631@home.osdl.org>
On Mon, Dec 15 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > The old ide-scsi reset function is just terminally broken, there's no way
> > > it can work. This patch _might_ make it work, but is more likely to just
> > > print out what it's trying to do.
> >
> > abort doesn't work well either, and ide-scsi needs to be ported to do
> > proper new error handling.
>
> Yeah. But at least it doesn't look like it would lock up the machine by
> just being horribly wrong (like the reset code would). After all, all it
> does is to wait for the requests to finish.
>
> So I'm hoping that with just the reset routine basically removed, the
> thing might limp along. But since I can't test it (and am not that
> horribly motivated by it), I'll just see if somebody reports any success
> at all with that patch.
So you're advocating a bandaid :)
However, if that patch makes ide-scsi limp along (it probably does),
then it will never get fixed for real. I suspect you don't care about
that, neither do I.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-15 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-15 13:58 'bad: scheduling while atomic!', preempt kernel, 2.6.1-test11, reading an apparently duff DVD-R Toad
2003-12-15 15:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-15 15:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-15 17:49 ` Toad
2003-12-15 17:54 ` David T Hollis
2003-12-15 17:57 ` grundig
2003-12-15 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-16 8:00 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-15 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-16 22:34 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-15 15:46 ` Toad
2003-12-15 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-15 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-15 19:13 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-15 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-15 20:04 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031215200456.GB12192@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toad@amphibian.dyndns.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox