From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264162AbTLOWCL (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:02:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264163AbTLOWCL (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:02:11 -0500 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:19875 "EHLO dualathlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264162AbTLOWCI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:02:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:02:57 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper Message-ID: <20031215220257.GM6730@dualathlon.random> References: <20031214172156.GA16554@work.bitmover.com> <2259130000.1071469863@[10.10.2.4]> <20031215151126.3fe6e97a.vsu@altlinux.ru> <20031215132720.GX7308@phunnypharm.org> <20031215192402.528ce066.vsu@altlinux.ru> <20031215183138.GJ6730@dualathlon.random> <20031215185839.GA8130@work.bitmover.com> <20031215194057.GL6730@dualathlon.random> <20031215214452.GB8130@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031215214452.GB8130@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:44:52PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > all. It's our tool and the use of our tool to export information how the is the web your tool too? in your previous email you said the information is available via bkbits web. But in an older email you said if we would use the web to fetch information you would shut it down (for whatever reason, not relevant for this email). Please clarify this single point: is the "web" a tool we can use to fetch information? If not (as you claimed months ago), then the information exported in the web sure can't be classified as information to use for interoperability as you stated a few emails ago today. I'm fine with the partial info in bkcvs, not sure why you say I'm not happy or why you think my emotions matters at all with this thread.