From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264262AbTLOWrG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:47:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264265AbTLOWrG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:47:06 -0500 Received: from ipcop.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.15]:20416 "EHLO work.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264262AbTLOWq3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:46:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:46:26 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Larry McVoy , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper Message-ID: <20031215224626.GD8130@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Tupshin Harper , Larry McVoy , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031214172156.GA16554@work.bitmover.com> <2259130000.1071469863@[10.10.2.4]> <20031215151126.3fe6e97a.vsu@altlinux.ru> <20031215132720.GX7308@phunnypharm.org> <20031215192402.528ce066.vsu@altlinux.ru> <20031215183138.GJ6730@dualathlon.random> <20031215185839.GA8130@work.bitmover.com> <20031215194057.GL6730@dualathlon.random> <20031215214452.GB8130@work.bitmover.com> <3FDE376D.4060309@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FDE376D.4060309@tupshin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sigh. Tupshin, everyone hates these discussions and I'm in agreement with them. What you want to discuss isn't about kernel development, it's about building SCM systems. There are better places to do that than here. If you need clarification on whether you are violating our license, consult a lawyer. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm