From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264303AbTLOXPI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:15:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264305AbTLOXPI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:15:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:18864 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264303AbTLOXPE (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:15:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:14:53 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Vladimir Kondratiev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI Express support for 2.4 kernel Message-ID: <20031215231453.GM9543@kroah.com> References: <12InT-wQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <135Nw-5gv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <137wc-q1-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <3FDE3A51.7060802@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FDE3A51.7060802@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:48:49AM +0200, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > > My fist intention was exactly same as yours, but if all access were done > through pci_dev... Look at 2.6's version of pci_[read|write]_config_*() :) (yeah, it's just a wrapper around pci_bus_*() right now, but that's easier to change if we have to...) thanks, greg k-h