Re: Scheduler degradation since 2.5.66

Jamie Lokier
2003-12-16T00:53:37Z

George Anzinger wrote:
> Try running the test with a requested sleep time of something less than
> 0.999849 ms. All this is for the x86 which is using this time to do the
> best it can with the PIT which can only get this close to 1 ms ticks. You
> can even vary this number to see exactly where the round up actually
> happens. Ah, life in the nano world :)

Would it be better to program the PIT for lowest frequency that's >= 1.0ms.

-- Jamie