From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264382AbTLPXmv (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:42:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264383AbTLPXmm (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:42:42 -0500 Received: from delerium.codemonkey.org.uk ([81.187.208.145]:36507 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264377AbTLPXmd (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:42:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:42:07 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: linux-kernel , pciids Subject: Re: pciids commit Message-ID: <20031216234207.GA26061@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Xose Vazquez Perez , linux-kernel , pciids References: <3FDF973F.60309@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FDF973F.60309@wanadoo.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:37:35AM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > can any of these developers do a 'commit' of pciids ? > > Dave Jones > Arjan van de Ven > Jeff Garzik > Lenz Grimmer > Martin Mares > Mike A. Harris > Bill Nottingham > Vojtech Pavlik > > there is a lot of updates since 2003-08-12 Assuming you mean a sync between pciids.sf.net & kernel, this is unlikely to happen until post 2.6.0. Linus hasn't been taking "this device wont work without this" type patches, which are IMHO more important than ID updates, so I can't see him taking this either. Dave