From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264889AbTLRBCG (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264890AbTLRBCG (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:02:06 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:39566 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264889AbTLRBCE (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:02:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:02:03 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle R_ALPHA_REFLONG relocation on Alpha (2.6.0-test11) Message-ID: <20031218010203.GA13385@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031213003841.GA5213@wang-fu.org> <20031217121010.GA11062@twiddle.net> <20031217193124.GA4837@wang-fu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031217193124.GA4837@wang-fu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:31:24PM -0600, Nathan Poznick wrote: > my next question is if this is a known/intended side effect -- enabling > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO means that modules cannot be used? No. This means there's a bug in the generic bits of the module loaders, that they're not discarding debugging sections. r~