Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??

Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-18T17:03:14Z

>> > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
>> > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
>> > altogether during 2.7.
>> >
>> > John.
>>
>> Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
>> is newer?
>
> The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for
> 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.

Oh great.
So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML.

M.