From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265358AbTLRWsd (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:48:33 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265364AbTLRWsd
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:48:33 -0500
Received: from mail.aei.ca ([206.123.6.14]:25813 "EHLO aeimail.aei.ca")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265358AbTLRWsc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:48:32 -0500
From: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Organization: me
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:48:20 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312171951030.5789@home.osdl.org> <3FE20077.80509@namesys.com> <20031218194203.GM2069@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031218194203.GM2069@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200312181748.21168.edt@aei.ca>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On December 18, 2003 02:42 pm, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18 2003, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > bill davidsen wrote:
> > >In article <006201c3c54c$2bb00c50$0e25fe0a@southpark.ae.poznan.pl>,
> > >
> > >Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv> wrote:
> > >| > Wondering if ALSA and Latest Usb updates from Greg KH will make it
> > >| > into 2.6.1 ?
> > >|
> > >| Is anything known about reiserfs4 becoming stable enough to be
> > >| included
> > >
> > >some
> > >
> > >| time soon. Maybe around 2.6.3-5
> > >
> > >I think that's vastly optimistic. As Hans has reported, it's still
> > >pretty alpha as yet. And you can thank him for not releasing it until
> > >he's happy with it!
> >
> > I don't think it is vastly optimistic, I hope we can send something in
> > next month, but you probably know how hard it is to estimate the time to
> > the last findable bug for a large project like ours.
>
> Not to mention the months long period of actually getting user testing
> and fixing all of those bugs before it's qualifiable for kernel
> inclusion.
>
> I hope you don't expect to actually have something that's worthy of
> being merged into 2.6.x in a months time?

I would hope it could go into mm though...  That would give a good 
test base.

Ed Tomlinson