From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265293AbTLRSpx (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:45:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265253AbTLRSpx (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:45:53 -0500 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:14470 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265293AbTLRSpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:45:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:45:10 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Chris Meadors , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Message-ID: <20031218184510.GD16315@mail.shareable.org> References: <20031218170628.GA3129@localhost.localdomain> <1071765527.12681.5.camel@clubneon.priv.hereintown.net> <72060000.1071768833@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72060000.1071768833@flay> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for > > 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'. > > Oh great. > So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML. Are you two aware of which body parts are sometimes called "beaver" and "cock"? -- Jamie