From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265294AbTLRTpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:45:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265295AbTLRTpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:45:54 -0500 Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28]:52190 "EHLO mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265294AbTLRTpx (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:45:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:45:37 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: MD Raid fixed? was: Linux 2.6.0 Message-ID: <20031218194537.GF6438@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031217211516.2c578bab.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031217211516.2c578bab.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:15:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > - There are significant changes in the module subsystem, the LVM (Device > Mapper) and RAID subsystems. Details about these and many other kernel There was a thread against 2.6.test11 about some issues with MD & DM. Also there was one report of problems with ext3+MD. I don't use LVM or DM, so I'm interested in the second case. Thanks