From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265374AbTLRWxW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:53:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265376AbTLRWxW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:53:22 -0500 Received: from tolkor.sgi.com ([198.149.18.6]:12234 "EHLO tolkor.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265374AbTLRWxT (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:53:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:53:07 -0600 From: Nathan Straz To: LKML Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0 durability test using OSDL-DBT-3 Message-ID: <20031218225307.GA1636@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: LKML References: <1071770839.12786.5.camel@ibm-a.pdx.osdl.net> <3FE1EE33.6090002@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE1EE33.6090002@backtobasicsmgmt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:13:07AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Jenny Zhang wrote: > >To test Linux 2.6.0 durability, we stressed the OS under OSDL-DBT-3 > >workload for 14 days. > > It was released yesterday, how did you manage that? The article says they used the 2.6.0-test7 kernel. -- Nate Straz nstraz@sgi.com sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/