From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262458AbTLSKlK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:41:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262397AbTLSKlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:41:09 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:41878 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262373AbTLSKlB (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:41:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:40:50 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] linux.bkbits.net Message-ID: <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ihar 'Philips' Filipau , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote: > It is rather strange to 'bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5' > and to find in Makefile: > VERSION = 2 > PATCHLEVEL = 6 > SUBLEVEL = 0 > EXTRAVERSION = > Or it is only me who finds this strange? > When transition from 2.5 to 2.6 is planned? > After all stable branch deserve to have NOT odd version number :) You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released. -- wli