From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262683AbTLSLKG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:10:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262686AbTLSLKG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:10:06 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:46998 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262683AbTLSLKB (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:10:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 03:09:57 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] linux.bkbits.net Message-ID: <20031219110957.GM31393@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Tupshin Harper , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> <3FE2D7F7.9010703@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE2D7F7.9010703@tupshin.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released. On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:50:31AM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote: > Uh...no. He's talking about the fact that it is conceptually odd to pull > a 2.6(final) linux from a 2.5 URL. That's all. > -Tupshin bk pull doesn't require an argument; it defaults to using the stored parent repository. So "normally" the name of the repository wouldn't be seen or given at all. If it moved, it would cause an error when the parent repository could not be found. Regardless of whether the state of affairs under discussion is altered, the above is why it wasn't a consideration in my original reply. -- wli