From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263667AbTLSXzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:55:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263702AbTLSXzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:55:42 -0500 Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net ([64.164.98.8]:25069 "EHLO mta7.pltn13.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263667AbTLSXzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:55:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:55:21 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Maciej Zenczykowski Cc: Arnaud Fontaine , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops with 2.4.23 Message-ID: <20031219235521.GK6438@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Maciej Zenczykowski , Arnaud Fontaine , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031219224402.GA1284@scrappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:35:24AM +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote: > > So i have just tested to run memtest86 on my box and i have had no error > > with this. I have also tested cpuburn without any result. Have you some > > others ideas ? > > you did run memtest for a minimum dozen hours? sometimes it takes that > long to find errors... Has anyone noticed if several runs with the normal tests, or a single test with all tests running catches more errors?