From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261931AbTLUBBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 20:01:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261936AbTLUBBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 20:01:18 -0500 Received: from crisium.vnl.com ([194.46.8.33]:59154 "EHLO crisium.vnl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261931AbTLUBBO (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 20:01:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:01:12 +0000 From: Dale Amon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Is there still at 2TB limit? Message-ID: <20031221010112.GX25351@vnl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dale Amon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux, the choice of a GNU generation Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've got to make a very large file system and ran across old discussions on a patch for the 2TB file system size problem. Is this standard in 2.6.0 kernels? What filesystem size and file size limits are there currently? -- ------------------------------------------------------ Dale Amon amon@islandone.org +44-7802-188325 International linux systems consultancy Hardware & software system design, security and networking, systems programming and Admin "Have Laptop, Will Travel" ------------------------------------------------------