From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262767AbTLUMiA (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:38:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262817AbTLUMh7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:37:59 -0500 Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr ([213.228.0.62]:43420 "EHLO postfix4-1.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262767AbTLUMh6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:37:58 -0500 From: Duncan Sands To: Matthias Andree , Linux-Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Fw: 2.6.0-test11 BK: sg and scanner modules not auto-loaded? Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:37:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031219181039.GI3017@kroah.com> <20031221003020.63E6A2C0B8@lists.samba.org> <20031221012531.GB30123@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20031221012531.GB30123@merlin.emma.line.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312211337.30900.baldrick@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 December 2003 02:25, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Rusty Russell wrote: > > It's been argued that kmod should place a request with the hotplug > > subsystem, rather than call modprobe, but that's a little too radical > > for me just yet. > > Hotplug works for 2.4, I don't know what is different in 2.6 - are there > hotplug relevant kernel changes? Stupid question maybe, but I'm asking > nonetheless :-) I haven't been following this thread, so I don't know if this is relevant: do you have the *very latest* hotplug scripts? The previous ones tested the kernel version against "2.5", while the latest test against that and also "2.6". I think this was in the usb script. Without the "2.6" test device scripts are not run, at least for usb devices. Ciao, Duncan.