From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264479AbTLVVYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:24:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264498AbTLVVYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:24:45 -0500 Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net ([64.164.98.8]:8086 "EHLO mta7.pltn13.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264479AbTLVVYF (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:24:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:23:44 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Merge more VM from 2.4-aa? was: Linux 2.4.24-pre2 Message-ID: <20031222212344.GS6438@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Xose Vazquez Perez , linux-kernel References: <3FE759A4.50208@wanadoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE759A4.50208@wanadoo.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > Do you plan on merging any more of the VM from Andrea in this release (or > > future releases)? > > Andrea said [1] that there are two patches missing: inode-highmem and > related_bhs > But he is not going to work on it for 2.4 > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107048611507709&w=2 Yes, I read this one when it was posted, but forgot the details. It seems that inode-highmem is relatively self contained though.