From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:24:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312231224.49069.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FE79626.1060105@cyberone.com.au>
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:11, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I think this patch is much too ugly to get into such an elegant scheduler.
> No fault to you Con because its an ugly problem.
You're too kind. No it's ugly because of my code but it works for now.
> How about this: if a task is "delta" priority points below a task running
> on another sibling, move it to that sibling (so priorities via timeslice
> start working). I call it active unbalancing! I might be able to make it
> fit if there is interest. Other suggestions?
I discussed this with Ingo and that's the sort of thing we thought of. Perhaps
a relative crossover of 10 dynamic priorities and an absolute crossover of 5
static priorities before things got queued together. This is really only
required for the UP HT case.
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-23 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-23 0:38 [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware Con Kolivas
2003-12-23 1:11 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-23 1:24 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-12-23 1:36 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-23 2:42 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-23 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-23 3:15 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-23 3:16 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-26 23:03 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-23 15:51 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-23 22:09 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-30 0:35 ` bill davidsen
2004-01-02 20:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-26 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-26 23:42 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-26 23:49 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-27 11:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-27 11:15 ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-30 0:29 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29 7:02 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-29 12:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-27 8:52 ` Mika Penttilä
2003-12-30 0:32 ` bill davidsen
2004-01-02 20:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-02 20:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-02 21:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-02 23:34 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-23 1:59 Nakajima, Jun
2003-12-23 2:40 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-23 5:33 Nakajima, Jun
2003-12-23 10:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200312231224.49069.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox