From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265147AbTLWPKp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:10:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265154AbTLWPKo (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:10:44 -0500 Received: from crisium.vnl.com ([194.46.8.33]:36358 "EHLO crisium.vnl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265147AbTLWPKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:10:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:10:42 +0000 From: Dale Amon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Question on LFS in Redhat Message-ID: <20031223151042.GE9089@vnl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dale Amon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux, the choice of a GNU generation Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If there are any Redhat folk around... could you tell me if you've included the LFS patches in your: 2.4.16-9smp I'm chatting with a company whose product may use this and it just might be the case they now support >2TB filesystems without having realized they did ;-) -- ------------------------------------------------------ Dale Amon amon@islandone.org +44-7802-188325 International linux systems consultancy Hardware & software system design, security and networking, systems programming and Admin "Have Laptop, Will Travel" ------------------------------------------------------