From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263166AbTLWWXm (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:23:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263130AbTLWWXm
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:23:42 -0500
Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:45517 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263166AbTLWWXl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:23:41 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:50:46 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Yaroslav Klyukin <skintwin@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0 and x86_64
Message-ID: <20031223215046.GW6438@matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Yaroslav Klyukin <skintwin@mail.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <3FE8B339.8080708@mail.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3FE8B339.8080708@mail.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:27:21PM -0500, Yaroslav Klyukin wrote:
> Did anybody have any experience with %subj%?
> I am curious about stability.

You need a big patch that hasn't been merged into stock 2.6.0.

There was a patch posted the same day of the 2.6.0 relese.

Mike