Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

[Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>]

Hey, Pavel, do me a favor and take me off the cc list.  I've unsubscribed
from the Linux kernel list, this is a good example of why.  No sense of
humor on your part, and you are whining about a license on a 200 line
chunk of code.  Any decent programmer could have reimplemented it in
less time than it took you to complain.

On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 09:02:57PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > and patches.  The idea is to make it possible for all trees hosted by
> > bkbits.net provide access to the data with a free client (included
> 					       ~~~~
> > below
> > in prototype form).
> 
> Unfortunately that is not free client for any reasonable definition of
> "free"; which matters, because it means that tarball.c is not getting
> into any distribution in any form. Someone will simply have to
> reimplement it.
> 								Pavel
> 
> > /*
> >  * tarball.c copyright (c) 2003 BitMover, Inc.
> >  *
> >  * Licensed under the NWL - No Whining License.
> >  *
> >  * You may use this, modify this, redistribute this provided you agree:
> >  * - not to whine about this product or any other products from BitMover, Inc.
> >  * - that there is no warranty of any kind.
> >  * - retain this copyright in full.
> >  */
> 
> -- 
> When do you have a heart between your knees?
> [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]

-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm