From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263861AbTLYId5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:33:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264144AbTLYId5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:33:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:30142 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263861AbTLYId4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:33:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 09:33:50 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Bruce Ferrell , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: is it possible to have a kernel module with a BSD license?! Message-ID: <20031225083348.GB29678@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <3FE9ADEE.1080103@baywinds.org> <1072282214.5267.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20031224221114.GB6438@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031224221114.GB6438@matchmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:11:14PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > I think you need to look further; the linux kernel portion sure is GPL > > ... >=20 > Then the wrapper can be GPL then and the rest BSD? The BSD license is actually GPL compatible so that's perfectly fine.... --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/6qDrxULwo51rQBIRApglAKCf7JU/UDcACkFy9CzqDvehX33VWgCeOpxW ZfsFrZO5RqGw74fYtvfmiAI= =6rz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--