public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:25:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031228182545.B20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031228174622.A20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:46:22PM +0000

On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:46:22PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Alan Cox has shed some light on this problem.  He mentions that the
> x86 GDT/LDT stuff changed around 2.5.30, which is the time when others
> have also reported that their APM has stopped working.  I've not
> confirmed whether that is the case for me as well, but it seems to
> be highly likely.
> 
> I also asked Alan if there's the possibility of backing this out or
> making it configurable, but the answer seems to be a most definite
> no.  However, maybe Ingo can say otherwise?
> 
> This effectively means that people with laptops which do not work
> with 2.6 APM nor ACPI can expect their machines to be stuck with 2.4
> for the future, unless someone with the necessary knowledge sees this
> problem as important enough to solve.

A quick follow-up from a discussion I've just had with Andi Kleen...
Note that I know nothing about the x86 internals of LDT/GDT/APM stuff,
so I'm clutching at straws here...

Would it be possible to switch LDT/GDT to whatever the APM BIOS expects
just before calling the APM BIOS to suspend/hibernate, and restore them
to whatever Linux requires after the APM BIOS returns from resume?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-28 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-05 16:10 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues) Russell King
2003-12-28 17:46 ` Russell King
2003-12-28 18:25   ` Russell King [this message]
2003-12-28 20:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 11:43       ` Russell King
2003-12-30 16:50         ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:17           ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:47             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 19:40               ` Russell King
2003-12-30 19:53                 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 23:00                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-31  1:45                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-12-31 12:40                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-03  3:43                         ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-03 18:28             ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031228182545.B20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox