From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal?
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:44:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com> (raw)
I'm running 2.4.23-rc5, and I've been running bonnie, burnMMX and burnK7 for
the last few days on my 3 drive md raid5 array, and I noticed that my
rsects[1] have gone negative. I might consider this normal but /proc/stat
(which only shows hda) doesn't show any negative numbers for the same
stats[2]
Is this a bug?
[1]
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
9 0 319388032 md0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 1 96256 md1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 0 160086528 hdi 240438349 1318355451 -414508366 16504630 101146331 1132637971 1281537580 24939164 -3 18108868 28693926
56 1 96358 hdi1 58 28 178 1500 102 41 292 1710 0 3170 3210
56 2 289170 hdi2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 3 159694132 hdi3 240438290 1318355420 -414508552 16503120 101146229 1132637930 1281537288 24937454 0 19884967 309062
33 0 160086528 hde 240516418 1321486397 -388859454 40325686 90645794 1146603482 1312002136 18444936 -3 14785505 12315041
33 1 289138 hde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33 2 159790522 hde2 240516417 1321486394 -388859462 40325686 90645794 1146603482 1312002136 18444936 0 24147141 26883069
3 0 160086528 hda 240675036 1318323453 -412885008 27008859 110939441 1126008079 1306648420 28401642 -3 24294848 41908774
3 1 96358 hda1 44 53 200 610 102 41 292 1470 0 2010 2080
3 2 289170 hda2 207445 623814 6650072 2773650 7261 19429 224992 63170 0 1882590 2837130
3 3 159694132 hda3 240467546 1317699583 -419535288 24234589 110932078 1125988609 1306423136 28337002 0 4327510 10687939
[2]
cpu 73561013 1160924 31161337 40771206
cpu0 73561013 1160924 31161337 40771206
page 1152185038 1257557610
swap 834055 28177
intr 1291475450 146654480 8 0 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 351908342 0 341855446 0 331412420 0 0 0 0 119644745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
disk_io: (3,0):(352031779,240762616,3890919112,111269163,1325101012)
ctxt 2665965022
btime 1071282031
processes 889037
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 1:44 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-12-30 2:11 ` [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal? Andreas Dilger
2003-12-30 2:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-30 11:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-30 17:27 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox