From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265789AbTL3NgO (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:36:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265791AbTL3NgO (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:36:14 -0500 Received: from mail.aei.ca ([206.123.6.14]:19400 "EHLO aeimail.aei.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265789AbTL3NgN (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:36:13 -0500 From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 - Watchdog patches (BK consistency checks) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:36:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <20030906125136.A9266@infomag.infomag.iguana.be> <20031230004907.GA29143@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20031230004907.GA29143@merlin.emma.line.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312300836.16559.edt@aei.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On December 29, 2003 07:49 pm, Matthias Andree wrote: > Well, talk about FAAAAAAST drives (10,025/min SCSI kind) unless you have > time to waste on all those BK consistency checks (which are, of course, > what #3 is all about). > > Or am I missing some obvious short cut? Is there a way to tell BK when to do consistency checks? Here they easily take 15-20 min each time. I would love to be able to tell BK to defer these checks. Ed Tomlinson