From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:43:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031230114324.A1632@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312281248190.11299@home.osdl.org>; from torvalds@osdl.org on Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:49:21PM -0800
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:49:21PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to switch LDT/GDT to whatever the APM BIOS expects
> > just before calling the APM BIOS to suspend/hibernate, and restore them
> > to whatever Linux requires after the APM BIOS returns from resume?
>
> Possible, yes. But it would help a lot to know what's wrong with the
> current segments - we did leave most of them with exactly the same layout
> as before, and I thought we explicitly left the ones that APM cares about
> that way..
With thanks to Arjan, I think we've proven that this is not the change
which is causing the problem by testing various Red Hat and Fedora 2.4
kernels on the machine (which have various 2.6 NPTL backports.)
I'm now back to being completely out of my depth on this issue; a 2.4
kernel booted through to init=/bin/bash suspends, but a 2.6 kernel
with the same hardware support booted to the same point refuses to
suspend via APM.
I think I'm going to have to resort to a binary search of the 2.5
kernel series to find out exactly what broke and when.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-05 16:10 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues) Russell King
2003-12-28 17:46 ` Russell King
2003-12-28 18:25 ` Russell King
2003-12-28 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 11:43 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-12-30 16:50 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:17 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 19:40 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 19:53 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 23:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-31 1:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-12-31 12:40 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-03 3:43 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-03 18:28 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031230114324.A1632@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox