From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265855AbTL3R1Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:27:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265859AbTL3R1Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:27:24 -0500 Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.56]:10908 "EHLO mtaw6.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265855AbTL3R1X (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:27:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:27:17 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal? Message-ID: <20031230172717.GT1882@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com> <20031229191106.I6209@schatzie.adilger.int> <20031230024331.GN1882@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:58:19AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > struct hd_struct in include/linux/genhd.h:61 has them all unsigned int. > > > > How's this patch look against 2.4.23? > > Looks good, applied. > Great, thanks Marcelo!