From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265821AbTL3VZf (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:25:35 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265817AbTL3VZe
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:25:34 -0500
Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:35334 "EHLO
	phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S265808AbTL3VZa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:25:30 -0500
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:24:50 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Pat Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6
Message-ID: <20031230212450.A9765@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Pat Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>, akpm@osdl.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20031228143603.A20391@infradead.org> <Pine.SGI.3.96.1031230151441.2502941C-100000@daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.96.1031230151441.2502941C-100000@daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com>; from pfg@sgi.com on Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:21:13PM -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:21:13PM -0600, Pat Gefre wrote:
> I'll drop 071. So I can assume that if I get rid of the renaming in 075
> you are OK with that ?

Yes.  I don't like some of the stuff it doesn, but it's defintily not
a showstopper.