From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264602AbTL3VbD (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:31:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265351AbTL3VbC (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:31:02 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-02-qfe0.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]:25022 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264602AbTL3Va6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:30:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:30:50 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.5isms Message-ID: <20031230213050.GA3301@andromeda> References: <20030703200134.GA18459@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030703200134.GA18459@andromeda> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Justin Pryzby Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It seems I've found another 2.5ism. 2.6.0, arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c has #ifdef CONFIG_SIMNOW /* * Skip on x86/64 with simnow. Will eventually go away * If you see this ifdef in 2.6pre mail me ! */ return -1; #endif I don't know whose file this is .. Also, 2.6.0 still has the previously mentioned problem in include/asm/io.h. Not subscribed, CC me. Justin On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:01:34PM -0700, pryzbyj wrote: > Linux 2.4.21, include/asm/io.h:51 says "Will be removed in 2.4". Its > there in 2.5.74 as well. > > I can understand why it would be in 2.5; the comment should say 2.6, > though. > > Justin