public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@lycos.it>
To: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:04:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FF5B3AB.5020309@wmich.edu>

On Friday 02 January 2004 19:08, Ed Sweetman wrote:
>
>
> Note, sometimes when moving backwards back to a lower readhead my speed
> does not decrease to the values you see here. readahead on my system
> always goes up (on avg) with higher readahead numbers, maxing at 8192.
> No matter the buffer size or speed or position the ide drive is in.
>
> hdparm -t is difficult to get really accurate, which is why they suggest
> running it multiple times.  I see differences of 4MB/sec on subsequent
> runs without changing anything.  run hdparm -t at least 3-4 times for
> each readahead value.
>
> I suggest trying 128, 256,512,8192 as values for readahead and skip all
> those crap numbers in between.
>
>
> if you still see on avg lower numbers on the top end, try nicing hdparm
> to -20.  Also, update to a newer hdparm. hdparm v5.4, you seem to be
> using an older one.
>

ok, hdparm updated to v5.4

and this is the new script:
_____________________________________________________________________
#!/bin/bash

# This script assumes hdparm v5.4

NR_TESTS=3
RA_VALUES="64 128 256 8192"

killall5
sync
hdparm -a 0 /dev/hda > /dev/null
hdparm -t /dev/hda > /dev/null

for ra in $RA_VALUES; do
    hdparm -a $ra /dev/hda > /dev/null;
    echo -n $ra$'\t';
    tot=0;
    for i in `seq $NR_TESTS`; do
	tmp=`nice -n '-20' hdparm -t /dev/hda|grep 'Timing'|tr -d ' '|cut -d'=' -f2|cut -d'M' -f1`;
	tot=`echo "scale=2; $tot+$tmp" | bc`;
    done;
    s=`echo "scale=2; $tot/$NR_TESTS" | bc`;
    echo $s;
done
_____________________________________________________________________


The results are like the previous.

2.6.0:
64        31.91
128      31.89
256      26.22	# during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192    26.26	# during the transfer HD LED blinks

2.6.1-rc1:
64        25.84	# during the transfer HD LED blinks
128      25.85	# during the transfer HD LED blinks
256      25.90	# during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192    26.42	# during the transfer HD LED blinks

I have tried with and without "nice -n '-20'" but without any visible changes.

Performance with 2.4:
with kernel 2.4.23 && readahead = 8 I get 31.89 MB/s...
changing readahead doesn't seem to affect the speed too much.

Bye

-- 
	Paolo Ornati
	Linux v2.4.23


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-02 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-02 16:02 Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again) Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 18:08 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-02 21:04   ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2004-01-02 21:27     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 10:20       ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 21:32     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-02 22:34       ` Martin Josefsson
2004-01-03 11:13         ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03 22:40           ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 14:30             ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-05 23:19               ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 14:59                 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 19:23                   ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 20:12                     ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 23:57                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-08  7:31                         ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09  1:05                         ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09  1:17                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 19:15                             ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 19:44                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-10 14:48                               ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 16:00                                 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 16:19                                   ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 17:29                                     ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 17:29                                   ` Paolo Ornati
2004-03-29 15:45               ` Ram Pai
2004-01-04 17:15             ` Buffer and Page cache coherent? was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 22:10               ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:22                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 23:32                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:45                     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-05  0:23                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-03 10:20       ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03  3:33     ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03  4:15       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 13:39         ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03 20:56           ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-04  3:02         ` jw schultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it \
    --to=ornati@lycos.it \
    --cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox