From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@lycos.it>
To: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:04:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FF5B3AB.5020309@wmich.edu>
On Friday 02 January 2004 19:08, Ed Sweetman wrote:
>
>
> Note, sometimes when moving backwards back to a lower readhead my speed
> does not decrease to the values you see here. readahead on my system
> always goes up (on avg) with higher readahead numbers, maxing at 8192.
> No matter the buffer size or speed or position the ide drive is in.
>
> hdparm -t is difficult to get really accurate, which is why they suggest
> running it multiple times. I see differences of 4MB/sec on subsequent
> runs without changing anything. run hdparm -t at least 3-4 times for
> each readahead value.
>
> I suggest trying 128, 256,512,8192 as values for readahead and skip all
> those crap numbers in between.
>
>
> if you still see on avg lower numbers on the top end, try nicing hdparm
> to -20. Also, update to a newer hdparm. hdparm v5.4, you seem to be
> using an older one.
>
ok, hdparm updated to v5.4
and this is the new script:
_____________________________________________________________________
#!/bin/bash
# This script assumes hdparm v5.4
NR_TESTS=3
RA_VALUES="64 128 256 8192"
killall5
sync
hdparm -a 0 /dev/hda > /dev/null
hdparm -t /dev/hda > /dev/null
for ra in $RA_VALUES; do
hdparm -a $ra /dev/hda > /dev/null;
echo -n $ra$'\t';
tot=0;
for i in `seq $NR_TESTS`; do
tmp=`nice -n '-20' hdparm -t /dev/hda|grep 'Timing'|tr -d ' '|cut -d'=' -f2|cut -d'M' -f1`;
tot=`echo "scale=2; $tot+$tmp" | bc`;
done;
s=`echo "scale=2; $tot/$NR_TESTS" | bc`;
echo $s;
done
_____________________________________________________________________
The results are like the previous.
2.6.0:
64 31.91
128 31.89
256 26.22 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192 26.26 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
2.6.1-rc1:
64 25.84 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
128 25.85 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
256 25.90 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192 26.42 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
I have tried with and without "nice -n '-20'" but without any visible changes.
Performance with 2.4:
with kernel 2.4.23 && readahead = 8 I get 31.89 MB/s...
changing readahead doesn't seem to affect the speed too much.
Bye
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux v2.4.23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-02 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-02 16:02 Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again) Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 18:08 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-02 21:04 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2004-01-02 21:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 10:20 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 21:32 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-02 22:34 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-01-03 11:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 14:30 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-05 23:19 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 14:59 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 19:23 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 20:12 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-08 7:31 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 1:05 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 19:15 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-10 14:48 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 16:00 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 16:19 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 17:29 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 17:29 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-03-29 15:45 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-04 17:15 ` Buffer and Page cache coherent? was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-05 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-03 10:20 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03 3:33 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03 4:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 13:39 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03 20:56 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-04 3:02 ` jw schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it \
--to=ornati@lycos.it \
--cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox