From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER?
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:11:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040104111154.GN1882@matchmail.com> (raw)
If they do, then the config system should not allow you to enable both at
the same time.
Will CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE speed up bridging? It config help mentions
nic<->nic transfers...
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-04 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-04 11:11 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-01-04 20:32 ` Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040104111154.GN1882@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox