* Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER?
@ 2004-01-04 11:11 Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-01-04 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
If they do, then the config system should not allow you to enable both at
the same time.
Will CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE speed up bridging? It config help mentions
nic<->nic transfers...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER?
2004-01-04 11:11 Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? Mike Fedyk
@ 2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Harald Welte @ 2004-01-04 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Mike Fedyk
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:11:54AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> If they do, then the config system should not allow you to enable both at
> the same time.
They don't conflict. It should compile quite fine, but you cannot use
both of them at the same time.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-04 21:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-04 11:11 Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox