* Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? @ 2004-01-04 11:11 Mike Fedyk 2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-01-04 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel If they do, then the config system should not allow you to enable both at the same time. Will CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE speed up bridging? It config help mentions nic<->nic transfers... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? 2004-01-04 11:11 Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? Mike Fedyk @ 2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Harald Welte @ 2004-01-04 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Mike Fedyk [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --] On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:11:54AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > If they do, then the config system should not allow you to enable both at > the same time. They don't conflict. It should compile quite fine, but you cannot use both of them at the same time. -- - Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-04 21:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-01-04 11:11 Does CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE conflict with CONFIG_NETFILTER? Mike Fedyk 2004-01-04 20:32 ` Harald Welte
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox