From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Rob Love <rml@ximian.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
szepe@pinerecords.com, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:51:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040104215128.GA14982@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040104165028.GC31585@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 04:50:28PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:33:08AM -0500, Rob Love wrote:
>
> > Yah. I was just answering in the abstract to the "does cache line
> > matter on non-SMP" question.
> >
> > I actually like this patch (perhaps since I have a P-M :) and think it
> > ought to go in, although I agree with others that the P-M is more of a
> > super-P3 than a scaled down P4.
>
> FWIW, I agree with it too on the grounds that its non obvious the optimal
> setting is CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII. This seems cleaner IMO than changing the
> helptext to read...
>
> "Pentium II"
> "Pentium III / Pentium 4M"
> "Pentium 4"
>
> My other mail may have sounded like I objected to the patch per se, I don't.
Pentium M and Pentium 4M are two different beasts, by the way.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-04 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-04 12:27 Pentium M config option for 2.6 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-04 12:33 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-06 6:07 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-03-29 15:46 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-01-04 15:03 ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 16:25 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 16:33 ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 16:50 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 17:01 ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 17:14 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04 17:03 ` Troels Walsted Hansen
2004-01-04 17:35 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 21:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 20:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-04 21:55 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-04 23:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Rob Love
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Rob Love
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-29 15:42 Mikael Pettersson
2004-03-29 15:42 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-05 15:09 Amit Gurdasani
2004-01-05 15:22 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-01-04 14:10 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-04 14:43 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04 15:59 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04 2:28 Tomas Szepe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040104215128.GA14982@ucw.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=rml@ximian.com \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox