public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hinds <dhinds@sonic.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit <mehrotraamit@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: PCI memory allocation bug with CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:45:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040105154554.B12970@sonic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040105230016.D11207@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:00:16PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:07:07PM -0800, David Hinds wrote:
> > 
> > In arch/i386/kernel/setup.c we have:
> > 
> > 	/* Tell the PCI layer not to allocate too close to the RAM area.. */
> > 	low_mem_size = ((max_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + 0xfffff) & ~0xfffff;
> > 	if (low_mem_size > pci_mem_start)
> > 		pci_mem_start = low_mem_size;
> > 
> > which is meant to round up pci_mem_start to the nearest 1 MB boundary
> > past the top of physical RAM.  However this does not consider highmem.
> > Should this just be using max_pfn rather than max_low_pfn?
> > 
> > (I have a report of this failing on a laptop with a highmem kernel,
> > causing a PCI memory resource to be allocated on top of a RAM area)
> 
> Beware - people sometimes use mem= to tell the kernel how much RAM is
> available for its use.  Unfortunately, this overrides the E820 map,
> and causes the kernel to believe that all memory above the end of RAM
> is available for use.
> 
> This is not the case, especially on ACPI systems.

Yes and that was the original reason for this snippet of code.  It is
just a quick fix and shouldn't be needed if the E820 map is correct or
if the user has specified a correct mem= parameter.

-- Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-05 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-05 20:07 PCI memory allocation bug with CONFIG_HIGHMEM David Hinds
2004-01-05 23:00 ` Russell King
2004-01-05 23:45   ` David Hinds [this message]
2004-01-06  0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  0:44   ` David Hinds
2004-01-06  1:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  1:41       ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found] <1aJdi-7TH-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-06  3:32 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  3:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  4:05     ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  5:04       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  8:12         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  9:11           ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06  9:44             ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 10:16               ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06 10:49                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 15:37                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:48                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 22:29                     ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07  4:06                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  5:02                         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07  5:55                           ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07  6:06                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  6:08                               ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07  6:45                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  6:51                             ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07  2:43                               ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07  8:32                       ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-06 22:45                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  0:06                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  4:58                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  5:32                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 15:53                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 16:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 17:32                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-08 19:34                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  9:31                         ` Russell King
2004-01-07 15:06                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 20:29                             ` Russell King
2004-01-06 22:56     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040105154554.B12970@sonic.net \
    --to=dhinds@sonic.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mehrotraamit@yahoo.co.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox